Types of chronometric dating methods Adult phone chat sydney

Rated 4.42/5 based on 542 customer reviews

In addition, Morris (95) and Morris and Parker (97) draw an unwarranted parallel between their calculations and radiometric dating.

Most of their “ages” rely on the assumption of constant rates for processes known to vary.

The most obvious characteristic of the values listed in the table is their extreme variability — all the way from 100 years to 500,000,000 years.

This variability, of course, simply reflects the errors in the fundamental uniformitarian assumptions.

types of chronometric dating methods-50

Just how much more recent than 10,000 years cannot be determined from present scientific knowledge.

Nevertheless, all things considered, it seems that those ages on the low end of the spectrum are likely to be more accurate than those on the high end.

This conclusion follows from the obvious fact that: (1) they are less likely to have been affected by initial concentrations or positions other than “zero”; (2) the assumption that the system was a “closed system” is more likely to be valid for a short time than for a long time; (3) the assumption that the process rate was constant is also more likely to be valid for a short time than for a long time.

History, human or geological, represents our hypothesis, couched in terms of past events, devised to explain our present-day observations. Fundamentally, they are two: (1) We assume that natural laws are invariant with time (2) We exclude hypotheses of the violation of natural laws by Divine Providence, or other forms of supernaturalism. 31) The principle of uniformity, if it has any meaning at all in modern science, includes no more than these two principles.

Indeed, most modern scholars of the subject have concluded that uniformitarianism today is simply the application of the scientific method to nature and that the term is so confusing it should be abandoned (for example, Gould, 59, p. Thus, in assuming and then condemning constant rates for geologic processes, Morris and Parker (97) and their colleagues have set up a straw man based on an obsolete historical definition of uniformity that no modern geologist would accept.

Leave a Reply